Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Elliott v. Montana Department of Revenue

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2006No. 05-336Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Warner

¶18 I concur with the result of the Court’s opinion. I write to address the reason Elliott claims it is not necessary to find § 15-31-511, MCA, unconstitutional in order to secure the tax information he prays for. ¶19 Senator Elliott argues the “or as otherwise provided by law” exception in § 15-31-511(1), MCA, renders the statute ineffective because “law” includes Article II, Section 9 of the Montana Constitution.1

¶20 Section 15-31-511(1), MCA, provides:

Except as provided in this section in accordance with a proper judicial order or as otherwise provided by law, it is unlawful to divulge or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Becky Ex Rel. Beckey v. Butte-Silver Bow School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Allstate Insurance v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Great Falls Tribune Co. v. Great Falls Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Great Falls Tribune v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API