Legal Opinion
United States v. Bedouin S. S. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 9, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
This is a motion to vacate and set aside the service of a citation alleged to have been served upon the respondent. It appears that an action was commenced by the United States against the Bedouin Steamship Company to recover damages arising through the breach of a contract entered into between the parties August 20, 1900, for the chartering and use of the steamship Arab, the property of the respondent, which was warranted by the respondent to be, and to be kept, tight, staunch and strong and well and sufficiently manned and equipped for merchant or transport service. It…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Société Foncière Et Agricole Des États Unis v. MillikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Tuchband v. Chicago & Alton RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norfolk Southern R. v. ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
- Belgian Mission for Economic Cooperation v. Zarati Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935