Legal Opinion

Bombardier Capital Inc. v. Schoengold Sporn Laitman & Lometti, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lerner, J.), entered July 24, 2007, which denied respondent’s motion to quash a nonparty subpoena duces tecum, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remanded for an in camera inspection of the demanded documents and a determination of respondent’s claims of privilege.

Respondent having moved, on the basis of the attorney work-product privilege, to quash the subpoena duces tecum issued pursuant to a commission issued by a Florida court, it was incumbent upon the motion court to review the subpoena for its inclusion of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stenovich v. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & KatzNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Kirkland & Ellis v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P.New York Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Massachusetts Bay Insurance v. StammAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API