Porter v. Ackerman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ackerman has a contingent claim for contribution against Kim unless that claim was impaired by the 1972 judgment between Porter and Kim. Cf. Hayon v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 375 Mass. 644 (1978); O’Mara v. H.P. Hood & Sons, 359 Mass. 235 (1971). Ackerman has argued that the 1972 judgment could not be given any such effect because it was “not on the merits” or “without prejudice.” But it appears from G. L. c. 231, § 64, and Superior Court Rules 36 and 37, see also G. L. c. 250, § 15 — all as in force in 1972 prior to the adoption of our Civil Rules — that a judgment of nonsuit for failure to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayon v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of New EnglandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- O'Mara v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Beserosky v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Corning Glass Works, Third-Party v. Puerto Rico Water Resources Authority, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Osserman v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eastern Electrical Co. v. Taylor Woodrow Blitman Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Grace v. BuckleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. Fazio Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991
- ASN Park Essex, LLC v. E.M. Duggan, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2012