Legal Opinion
Appeal of Murdock
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 15, 2008No. 2007-297PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The petitioner, Donald W. Murdock, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board (PAB) affirming his dismissal from employment by the respondent, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT), following his receipt of three written warnings for the same offense within a five-year period. N.H. ADMIN. Rules, Per 1001.08(b)(1) (current version at 1002.08(c)(1)). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
We recite the facts as found by the PAB or as presented in the record. The petitioner was hired by the DOT in February 1994. He worked in various positions until…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Support Enforcement Officers I & IISupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. Elementis Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Appeal of AlleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Appeal of FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Appeal of City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Appeal of AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- New Hampshire Resident Ltd. Partners v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Appeal of Keelin B.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Appeal of MorrisseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Doe v. New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.