Legal Opinion
Heintz v. Heintz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order that denied his petition and granted the cross petition of respondent for sole custody of the parties’ son. Although Family Court erred in awarding temporary custody of the child to respondent without conducting an evidentiary hearing, there is no need to reverse on that basis because the court subsequently conducted a full custody hearing (see, Matter of Smith v Patrowski, 226 AD2d 1073). The record does not support the contention of petitioner that he was prejudiced by *972the temporary order, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Paul C. v. Tracy C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Smith v. PatrowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Foraker v. ForakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Winkelman v. FureyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tracy v. TracyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Komenda v. DininnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Linn v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- KOMENDA, DENVER v. DININNY, SAMANTHAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Komenda v. DininnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014