Legal Opinion

Mauritz v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1934No. 9948PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This general statement, deemed to be correct, has been taken from the appellee's brief:

"Eli Bell, appellee, brought this suit of trespass to try title in the district court of Jackson County, Texas, to recover certain land in that county. Appellee alleged, in substance, that on February 2, A.D. 1928, one J. M. Yoas, as agent for appellee, purchased the land in question for appellee and paid for it with appellee's money, but took the conveyance in his (Yoas') name. This, appellee said, made him the beneficial owner of the land, and Yoas a mere trustee. Subsequently, on December 10, A.D. 1929,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Burnett v. AtteberryTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Corn v. Crosby County Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Mead v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Kilpatrick v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gowan v. ReimersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Kirby Lumber Corporation v. John W. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Stinnette v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. McKee v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Brod v. First Nat. Bank of CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API