Legal Opinion
Holtberg v. Bommersbach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1952No. 35,703, 35,704PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
These are appeals in two actions from orders granting defendants? motions to set aside and quash the service of summonses and complaints therein and to dismiss the actions for want of jurisdiction. The actions are to recover damages because of the alleged negligence of defendants. The venue is laid in the district court for Todd county.
On May 29, 1951, a copy of the summons and complaint in each action was left for defendant Richard Feckler with his wife, Agnes. Feckler, at her house in Long Prairie, which plaintiff alleges was the defendant’s place of usual abode.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Berryhill v. SeppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Bechtel v. BechtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Heffner v. GunzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Bausman v. TilleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bull v. KistnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- O'SELL v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- United Bank of Loves Park v. DohmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- A & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. WetzlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Walker Employment Service, Inc. v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.