Commonwealth v. Lagenella
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
SHOGAN, J.:
I agree with the learned majority that Appellant’s challenge to the reinstituted charges is waived. However, I respectfully disagree that the warrantless search of Appellant’s vehicle was a reasonable inventory search.
In determining whether a proper inventory search occurred, the first inquiry is whether the police had lawful custody of the vehicle.1 The second inquiry is whether the police conducted a reasonable inventory search. Commonwealth v. Thompson, 999 A.2d 616, 619 (Pa.Super.2010) (citing Commonwealth v. Henley, 909 A.2d 352, 359…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HenniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BrandtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HenleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- United States v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.