Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Lagenella

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 2011No. 255 MDA 2010Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

I agree with the learned majority that Appellant’s challenge to the reinstituted charges is waived. However, I respectfully disagree that the warrantless search of Appellant’s vehicle was a reasonable inventory search.

In determining whether a proper inventory search occurred, the first inquiry is whether the police had lawful custody of the vehicle.1 The second inquiry is whether the police conducted a reasonable inventory search. Commonwealth v. Thompson, 999 A.2d 616, 619 (Pa.Super.2010) (citing Commonwealth v. Henley, 909 A.2d 352, 359…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. HenniganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BrandtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. HenleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. United States v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API