Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCrorey v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994Published

1Dissent

Balio and Doerr, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. The expert’s affidavit is conclusory in form and is not sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (cf., Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017). Although the expert states that the City’s maintenance of the chain link fence did not conform to "industry” standards, the expert did not set forth the specific industry or organization that has adopted the standards nor did he provide an official statement concerning those standards. That failure is fatal in this case because pages apparently taken from a manufacturer’s catalog or brochure and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turcotte v. FellNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Maddox v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Gallagher v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Giovinazzo v. Mohawk Valley Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API