Legal Opinion

Weber Co. v. Rossi

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

The first assignment for error is that the trial court admitted incompetent testimony upon the trial below, and that is perhaps the principal issue here. At the time of the transactions between the Weber Company and the Rossi Brothers there was an instrument in writing Which was signed by Rossi Brothers, and upon the trial be.low the court admitted testimony to the effect that the merchandise was not as repsented, and it was sought to justify the refusal of the same upon that ground, and it is claimed that the admission of that testimony served to contradict the terms of what is claimed to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morris v. Southwestern Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API