Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Jewell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1980No. D7808-13288, CA 15891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

We have granted wife’s petition for reconsideration, not because we conclude our decision to affirm the trial court’s child custody award was wrong, but because we agree that our opinion doing so may have been too abbreviated and conclusory: it is subject to an interpretation that in any domestic relations case we affirm the trial court unless we can say that it was clearly wrong. That interpretation would be too broad, although our ultimate decision, after giving due deference to the trial court’s opportunity to hear and see the parties and witnesses, may be based upon our conclusion that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rea v. ReaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Marriage of SettleOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hofer v. HoferOregon Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beal v. Gilchrist Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. In re the Marriage of SalchenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. In re the Marriage of ElginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Matter of Marriage of GoddardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Matter of Marriage of GoddardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API