Legal Opinion

Gallick v. Barto

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 26, 1993No. 4:CV-92-1426PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND:

On March 8, 1991, plaintiff Brittany Gal-lick, an infant then aged seven months, was bitten on and about the face by a ferret owned by Shawnee Miller and Todd Long. The bites left open wounds which have left scars on the face of Brittany. Her parents, Leonard and Sonina Gallick, initiated this action to recover for Brittany’s injuries. Originally, the defendants were Bruce and Betty Barto, the landlords of Miller and Long. They raised affirmative defenses against the Gallicks, and eventually Miller and Long were joined as third-party defendants.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Andrews v. Smith Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Albig v. MUN. AUTH. OF WESTMORELAND CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Palermo v. NailsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Deluca v. Whitemarsh TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. New York City Friends of Ferrets v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. AMBERWOOD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. MatthewsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. E.J. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API