Legal Opinion
Rudy v. Eagle Indemnity Co. Eagle Indemnity C0. v. Rudy
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1949No. 12789_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
These appeals by Manuel Rudy, the third party defendant, and Eagle Indemnity Company, cross-plaintiff and third party complainant, though separately numbered and docketed, arise out of the main suit of Wald v. Eagle Indemnity Company et al., 178 F.2d 91, the appeal in which we have this day decided.
Sued on its bond by Wald, Eagle Indemnity Company filed its cross-complaint against Gluck and third party action against Rudy, alleging: that Glucfc and Rudy had executed the general indemnity agreement sued on and attached to the pleading; that in and by it they had bound…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
- Womack v. W. U. Tel. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1882
- First Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. ZarafonetisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Riley Stoker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Piedmont Supply Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1961