Legal Opinion

Farquhar v. Fidelity Ins., etc., Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1878No. Case No. 4,676PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKENNAN, Circuit Judge.

It is an essential feature of a negotiable note that it should be made transferable, so as to give .the holder a right of action in his own name. Hence it has been held that the use of the ordinary terms “or order,” “or bearer,” are not indispensable to impress upon it this quality of transferability. Words of equivalent meaning, which clearly show the intention of the maker, are equally effectual. This is the import of most of the authorities referred to by the counsel for the respondents. They only determine that words in a bill or note, from which it can be inferred…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. CrossthwaitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Hubbard v. Robert B. Wallace Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Smith v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Merchants' Nat. Bank v. SevierUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
  5. Vancouver National Bank v. StarrWashington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API