Legal Opinion

Camden Woolen Co. v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 10, 1925No. 1010PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

This is an action at law to recover for the loss of certain shipments of goods, made hy the plaintiff over the lines of the defendant company, by a fire on its terminal at Camden, Me. The plaintiff is a corporation, manufacturing woolen goods at Camden, Me. The defendant is a common carrier by water, operating a fleet of passenger and freight steamers between the ports of New York and Boston, Portland, Rockland, Camden, Bangor and other ports, at all which ports it owns or controls terminal facilities.

On the morning of August 2, 1924, its terminal at Camden, Me., caught…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Peavey v. Philadelphia, B. & W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. (PC) Barth v. BorbeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (PC) Drake v. MehtaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Dresdner v. Sacramento County JailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PC) Gordon v. CooperDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PC) Oliveira v. Solano County SheriffsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API