Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Ferguson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 2012No. 09-FM-1219Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWagner, Senior Judge

I join the majority in reversing appellant’s conviction based upon his January 1st telephone call. However, the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant willfully disobeyed the terms of the CPO on December 24th. At that time, the CPO permitted appellant to contact petitioner (1) regarding the child, and (2) for announcement for pick up and return of the child for visitation.1 The evidence showed that on Christmas eve, appellant called petitioner, his two-year-old daughter’s mother, and told her that he had a gift for her that the child had purchased and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Hooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API