Legal Opinion

Krieger v. Future Logging

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1992No. WCB 89-03927; CA A71330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that, by entering into a disputed claim settlement (DCS) pursuant to ORS 656.289(4),1 claimant settled his claim for neck surgery and that, by entering into a claim disposition agreement (CDA) pursuant to ORS 656.236(1), he settled his aggravation claim. We affirm the Board and write only to discuss the scope of the DCS and whether recent statutory amendments permitting CDAs are applicable to the aggravation claim.

Claimant compensably injured his head, left wrist and shoulder and cervical spine in August, 1987. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saif Corp. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diamond Fruit Growers v. GossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. BASIN TIRE SERVICE, INC. v. MinyardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. BASIN TIRE SERVICE, INC. v. MinyardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API