Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Nicosia

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 The consolidated1 appeal in this matter purports to lie from an order certified by the trial court as final under Pa.R.A.P. 341(c)2 in a declaratory judgment action *1104brought to determine whether the parties’ business dealings could be characterized as a partnership. We quash, as the order under consideration is not final and appeal-able.

¶ 2 At some point in 1991, Appellant, a licensed psychologist with varied business interests, agreed to provide Appellee, a chiropractor, with financial assistance to establish a chiropractic business at a location different from each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bombar v. West American Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. ROBERT H. McKINNEY, JR. v. AlbrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Moore Motors, Inc. v. BeaudrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leonhardt, B. v. Mley, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Stewart, R. v. Nicosia, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Zavilla, J. v. Geibel, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API