Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Supervisor of Barnett Township

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1881PublishedCited by 43 opinions

This was an application to this court for an alias peremptory writ of mandamus, to compel the present supervisor of Barnett township to perform a duty which his predecessor in office had refused to perform, as indicated in The People ex rel. v. Supervisors of Barnett Township, 91 Ill. 422.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

A rule of this court, based upon an affidavit filed by the relator, was entered in this cause on January 13, 1881, against Lyman Barnett, to show why he should not he made party defendant to this suit, and why an alias writ of mandamus should not he issued to him, commanding him to perform the acts which his predecessor in office was, by the former writ in the case, ordered to perform, which was, to execute, on behalf of the town of which he was supervisor, certain bonds to the relator. The respondent made return to the rule, to which the relator has demurred.

• The first cause shown in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Badger v. United States Ex Rel. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. People Ex Rel. Williamson v. . McKinneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. People ex rel. GogginIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People ex rel. Sweet v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Doolittle v. Selectmen of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Eureka Pipe Line Co. v. RiggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API