Legal Opinion

Herault v. Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1976No. 51539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. From our original Code of 1863 until 1961 the Code provision now numbered § 19-301 specified the date on which an answer to a writ of certiorari should be filed and contained the language: "and [it] shall reply specifically to the allegations of the petition.” Ga. L. 1961, pp. 190,191, struck this language. It further provided for service and specified that failure to perfect service shall not affect the validity of the proceedings. It is interesting to note that the preamble to the law specifies among other things that Code § 19-301 is amended "so as to redefine the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Allen v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. Leggett & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. City of TallapoosaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Bailey v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Bembry v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Ultra Group of Companies, Inc. v. Inam International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API