Legal Opinion

PAUL EDWARDS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 2017No. 4D15-3253Published

1Opinion of the CourtKlingensmith, J.

Paul Edwards (“appellant”) appeals'his conviction for first degree murder. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence against him was insufficient. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm appellant’s conviction.

“The standard of review for the denial of a motion,for judgment of acquittal is de novo.” Ortiz v. State, 36 So.3d 901, 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). “If, after viewing the evidence in the. light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Schwarz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Brothers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API