United States v. M/V BIG SAM
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HEEBE, Chief Judge:
On its own motion, this Court heard oral argument and received additional memoranda relative to reconsideration of its ruling of May 9, 1978, as it relates to a determination of two issues: whether or not the United States has a cause of action for recovery of its actual expenses incurred in oil clean-up operations based on a maritime tort of oil pollution; what the interaction is between the Refuse Act of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. §§ 407, 411-12, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. Contrary to our decision,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- United States v. M/V BIG SAMDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978
- Complaint of Steuart Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. M/v Big Sam, in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Dixie Carriers, Inc., and Water Quality Insurance Syndicate, in Personam and M/v Dixie Buccaneer and T/b Abc 2311, in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Janet R. Miller-Schmidt v. Gastech, Inc., the American Bureau of Shipping, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Southwest Development Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- United States v. M/V BIG SAMDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981