Legal Opinion
Bricker v. Kay
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 13, 1984No. 83-2571PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
446 So.2d 1151 (1984)
Daniel S. BRICKER, Appellant,
v.
Howard I. KAY, Appellee.
No. 83-2571.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 13, 1984.
Harold M. Braxton, Miami, for appellant.
Howard I. Kay, pro se.
Arnold Ginsberg, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
Ten days before expiration of the statute of limitations appellee-defendant, an attorney at law, was retained to institute a lawsuit against "Lum's Restaurant Corp." After expiration of the time within which suit could commence it was learned that the wrong defendant was named. The complaint…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Augustine v. Southern Bell Telephone & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
- A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
4Cited by7 opinions
- Heldring v. Lundy Beldecos & Milby, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Thompson v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Kay v. BrickerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Mang v. Country Comfort Inn, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Nottage v. American Exp. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.