Legal Opinion · Dissent

Democratic County Committee Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1964No. Appeal, No. 329Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones:

Convinced that the decision of the majority of this Court, which results in the disfranchisement of thousands of voters, is contrary both to law and common sense, I register my dissent.

The stated bases of the majority’s ruling are: (1) the election law clearly proscribes the manner in which these disputed votes were cast; (2) the “set-up of [the] voting machines” was “clear to everyone”; (3) the “sample ballots” [herein called by the statutory term “specimen ballots”] were clearly worded and illustrated and they instructed the voters which lever to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. James AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API