Democratic County Committee Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Me. Justice Jones:
Convinced that the decision of the majority of this Court, which results in the disfranchisement of thousands of voters, is contrary both to law and common sense, I register my dissent.
The stated bases of the majority’s ruling are: (1) the election law clearly proscribes the manner in which these disputed votes were cast; (2) the “set-up of [the] voting machines” was “clear to everyone”; (3) the “sample ballots” [herein called by the statutory term “specimen ballots”] were clearly worded and illustrated and they instructed the voters which lever to…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- James AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.