Legal Opinion

State v. Tunick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 30, 2008No. SC 18262Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn. App. 611 (AC 28461), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant’s conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*944Decided October 30, 2008 Richard Emanuel, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TunickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API