Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pollock v. Rapid Industrial Plastics Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1985Published

1Dissent

Weinstein, J. (dissenting).

At issue here is the propriety of Trial Term’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of testimony.

On December 1, 1975, plaintiff was injured when he was struck from behind by a detached truck tire mounted on a rim while he was standing on an entrance ramp adjacent to the Bruckner Expressway after a minor vehicular accident. Plaintiff neither saw where the tire had come from nor realized what hit him. Mrs. Pollock first observed the tire rapidly rolling along the ground when it was some five feet away from her husband.

The record is utterly devoid of any explanation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. Banner Super Market, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Zellman v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Associated Ceilings Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API