Bucklin v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
Error to the court of common pleas of Henry county. At the May term, 1849, of said court, Bucklin, now plaintiff in error, was indicted for retailing spirituous liquors by less quantity than a quart without license ; and at the April term, 1850, he was tried and convicted on said indictment, and fined.
Read the full summary
Error to the court of common pleas of Henry county. At the May term, 1849, of said court, Bucklin, now plaintiff in error, was indicted for retailing spirituous liquors by less quantity than a quart without license ; and at the April term, 1850, he was tried and convicted on said indictment, and fined. During the trial a bill of exceptions was taken, which shows that the state introduced as a witness, Reuben Lamphier, who gave evidence tending to prove the defendant on trial guilty. “ The defendant then called L M. Yeris, as a witness on the part of defendant, who testified that he was…
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
The plaintiff in error was indicted for selling liquor without a license, tried and convicted. On the trial a bill of exceptions was taken to the ruling of the court, on which a single question is presented. After the state had rested, the defendant called J. M. Teris as a witness, who testified that he was acquainted with the prosecuting witness, Reuben Lamphier, and that he had the means of knowing his character for truth and veracity. Defendant then asked said witness what the character of said Lamphier was for truth and veracity, to which question the prosecuting attorney objected, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kimmel v. KimmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1817
3Cited by51 opinions
- Beach v. LeahySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- City of Ensley v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- City of New York v. Village of LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Gilmore v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.