Stuart v. Hatch

The appellee claiming to be the owner of certain property, on the 12th day of March, 1930, instituted an unlawful detainer suit against one S. M. Dismukes alleged- to be then wrongfully withholding .possession of the property against the owner Hatch.

On trial, judgment was entered against Dismukes and in favor of Hatch. Thereafter,' the appellants,' under the claim that Dismukes was in possession of the property as the agent of appellant, went into possession' of the property of which they had been in possession long prior to the beginning of the Dismukes possession, which possession was'a…