Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2010No. 02S03-1010-JV-518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

Father appealed the trial court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment. Because Father failed to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion in so doing, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Facts and Procedural History

Barrington Smith ("Father") and Lisa Smith ("Mother") were married in 1985. Four children were born during the marriage: B.A.S., born in 1986; S.M.S., born in 1989; P.S.S8., born in 1992; and C.W.S., born in 1996. In 2000 Father petitioned for dissolution in the Allen Cireuit Court. Mother and Father reached a mediated settlement agreement in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fairfield v. FairfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mid-West Federal Savings Bank v. EppersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Montgomery, Zukerman, Davis, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance CompaniesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. McIntyre v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Paternity of PSSIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API