Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Sewall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 6448Published

Error from County Court, Beckham County ; E. n. Gipson. Judge. Action by R. N. Sewall against the Chicago. Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

Defendant in error has failed to file a brief in support of his judgment. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to sustain its contention; and where plaintiff in error has prepared, served, and filed its brief as provided by the rules of this court; and there is a no brief filed by the defendant in error, nor reason given for its absence, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory on which the judgment below may be sustained ; but, where the brief filed by the plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bryan, St. Bd. of Agrl. v. St. Ex Rel. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API