Legal Opinion

M.G. Maher & Co. Ex Rel. Van Zyverden, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 30, 2002No. Court 01-01134Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs allege that 19 C.F.R. § 24.24(e) (finally promulgated on July 2, 2001) which established a deadline of December 31, 2001 for filing Harbor Maintenance Tax (“HMT”) refund claims is invalid. The court determines that this action shall be dismissed.

Background and Jurisdiction

In United States v. U.S. Shoe Corp., 523 U.S. 360 (1998), the Supreme Court found that the HMT, 26 U.S.C. § 4461 et seq., which applied to nearly all merchandise shipped through…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Skinner v. Mid-America Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Swisher International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API