Legal Opinion
Eidukonis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 1991No. Civ. A. 86-5142PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
In this matter, plaintiff sued Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority after being dismissed as a production control specialist. Plaintiff claimed defendant violated the Veteran’s Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 et seq., and after a four day bench trial, I found in his favor.
On appeal, the Third Circuit remanded with guidelines for analyzing plaintiff’s dismissal, 873 F.2d 688. This memorandum and order decides the ease in accordance with those instructions.
I.FACTS
A. The Original Facts.
After the trial of this matter, I made the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Poleto v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Kestutis Eidukonis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Wallace v. Hardee's of Oxford, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994