Legal Opinion

People v. Haase

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 2, 1989No. 88SA403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira

The disciplinary counsel filed a formal complaint with the Colorado Supreme Court Grievance Committee alleging professional misconduct by the respondent, Charles J. Haase. A stipulation of facts entered into between the respondent and the disciplinary counsel, along with the evidence adduced at the hearing, were the basis of the findings and conclusions of the hearing board (Board). The Board recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days, but because of the existence of mitigating factors, that forty-five days be stayed, thereby reducing the recommended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. People v. DistelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. People v. BergeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. BlanckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. In re OlsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. People v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. Rose Manufacturing Company v. United States Forgecraft Corporation David MonnichCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API