Blydenburgh v. . Ely
New York Court of Appeals
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 23, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for part of the relief demanded in the complaint, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to enforce a right of way across defendant’s land and to compel him to remove two gates which he had erected and locked, one across the road at the northern and the…
Read the full summary
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 23, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for part of the relief demanded in the complaint, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to enforce a right of way across defendant’s land and to compel him to remove two gates which he had erected and locked, one across the road at the northern and the other at the southern extremity of the defendant’s property. The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant concerning the…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Collin; Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Missionary Society of the Salesian Congregation v. EvrotasNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Roanoke Water Works Co. v. Roanoke Glass Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Missionary Society of the Salesian Congregation v. EvrotasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Jennings v. Lake Baldwin Taxpayers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Meyerson v. MeleNew York Supreme Court · 1962