Legal Opinion

Malone v. Gary

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1958No. 37418PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

Malone insists he was not the claimant’s employer because he merely charged Holliday a fee for allowing him to operate the cab in his line and the claimant’s dealings were with Holliday and not him. Malone applied for and obtained a license to engage in “the business of operating taxicabs in the City of Albany.” While he did not comply with the provisions of the ordinance which required him to own the taxicabs under the license issued to- him, this would not relieve him of the responsibilities imposed by such ordinance. “Individuals do not have the inherent right to- conduct…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Clem v. City of LaGrangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Diamond Cab Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Naseef v. Cord, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Rapid Group, Inc. v. Yellow Cab of Columbus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Worrell v. Yellow Cab CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Atlanta Million Cooperative Cab Co. v. Wilson-AcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Yellow Cab of Chatham County, Inc. v. KarwoskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API