Legal Opinion

State v. Long

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The defendant, being tried separately, was convicted of the crime of manufacturing intoxicating liquor. The principal testimony relied upon by the state to secure a conviction was that of an accomplice, Tom Scott, who testified that the liquor was manufactured upon his own place; that the defendant furnished the still, the material from which the liquor was manufactured and the barrels for containing it, and that he also sent two men to Scott’s place to assist in the manufacture of it and received a share of it, when made.

With the exception of the testimony given by Scott, no witness was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DugganOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. EgelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API