Legal Opinion
Soto v. City of Cambridge
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 20, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-10822-JGDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JOINDER
DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
As originally filed, this case raised the issue whether the plaintiffs First Amendment rights were violated when she was prohibited from placing noncommercial leaflets on parked cars in the City of Cambridge. It was the City’s position that such leafleting was prohibited by Cambridge City Ordinance § 9.04.050 (the “Ordinance”) and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 266, § 126 (the “Statute”). During the pen-dency of this action, the Ordinance was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Mangual v. Rotger-SabatCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Klein v. City of San ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saucedo v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- Mary Saucedo, et al. v. William Gardner, Secretary of State of the State of New Hampshire, in his official capacity, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018