Legal Opinion

Redwine v. Hunter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 13, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming.

Y. H. Redwine seeks to reverse a judgment on two notes of $400 each recovered against him by John C. Hunter.

In 1920 Jno. C. Hunter owned some property in Sandy Hook upon which a mill was erected by the par ties named below, wbo then made this contract with each other.

“Sandy Hook, Ky., August 28, 1920.
“Whereas J. C. Hunter, E. E. Sparks, C. B. Hunter and Y. H. Bedwine are equal partners and owners of the Sandy Hook Milling Company now operating in Sandy Hook, Kentucky, and as J. C. Hunter owns the lot in which the mill is located it is agreed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API