Legal Opinion

Hevener v. Reilly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1979No. 970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to one of five plaintiffs but refusing to grant a new trial to appellants as the other four plaintiffs. The issue on this appeal is whether appellants are entitled to a new trial because of the alleged inadequacy and inconsistency of the verdicts.

On August 25, 1969, John Jaskolski was driving his automobile along Route 1 in Penndel. With him were his wife Marion, his minor son Joseph, his minor daughter Jacqueline, and his mother-in-law Anna Hevener. While the Jaskolski automobile was stopped in traffic it was struck in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Paustenbaugh v. Ward Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Thompson v. IannuzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Prince v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Gottlob v. HillegasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Pascarella v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bortner v. GladfelterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Dawson v. FowlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Gudat v. HeubergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Mueller v. BrandonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Reid v. OxendineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API