Legal Opinion

Peter Condakes Co., Inc. v. Sandler Bros.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 16, 2009No. 2:09-cr-00168Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTACHMENT AND TRUSTEE PROCESS

GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.

This dispute arises from Defendants’ alleged failure to pay promptly for per ishable agricultural commodities and to maintain sufficient trust assets under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), 7 U.S.C. § 499a et seq. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Attachment and Trustee Process (Docket # 5). As explained herein, the motion is GRANTED IN PART as to Defendant Sandler Bros., Defendant Mark Sandler (“Mark”), and Defendant Candice O’Brien, and DENIED IN PART as to Defendant Marjorie…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael S. FISHER and Meryle Fisher, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Morris Okun, Inc. v. Harry Zimmerman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Golman-Hayden Co. v. Fresh Source Produce Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Hiller Cranberry Products, Inc. v. KoplovskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Mid-Valley Produce Corp. v. 4-XXX Produce Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API