Legal Opinion

21SC52- Owens v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 2022No. 22CO33PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The supreme court concludes that, under the specific circumstances present, the DOC is required to determine the parole eligibility date for the defendant’s one continuous sentence by employing a hybrid system that effectuates both of the calculation rules. Consequently, the DOC must apply the 50% rule to the sentence subject to that rule and the 75% rule to the two sentences subject to that rule. After doing so, the DOC must combine the resulting calculations to determine the parole eligibility date for the defendant’s single continuous sentence. This system at once honors the two different…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Jackson v. PollionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. DePierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. County Road Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. People v. BrogaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. IN RE: The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, IN the INTEREST OF L.S., Child, and Concerning: G.L.A. and D.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2023
  2. G.L.A. and D.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2023
  3. In Re The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Child: L.S., and Concerning G.L.A. and D.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2023
  4. In Re: Antero Treatment v. Veolia WaterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2023
  5. In re the Marriage of Nicholas Jay Dale and Nicole Jehlicka Dale., Respondent:Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API