Legal Opinion

DiPadova v. DiPadova

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1973No. Appeal, 350PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant husband was ordered to pay for the support of appellee wife and their two children, despite the fact that at the time of the hearing in the court below appellee and the children were residing in the same household as appellant. Appellant contends that Commonwealth v. George, 358 Pa. 118, 56 A. 2d 228 (1948), standing for the proposition that where a husband and wife (and their children) are living together in the same household and the husband provides the necessaries for that household the courts will not direct the husband to pay support nor become a sounding…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flynn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Biler v. BilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. MacKey v. MacKeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goldstein v. GoldsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Mackey v. MackeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API