Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Donald Wortman v. All Nippon Airways

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2017No. 15-15362, 15-15364Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Circuit Judge

I concur in the bulk of the majority’s well-reasoned opinion. I dissent, however, from the majority’s conclusion that genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the- DOT effectively abdicated its authority over fuel surcharges that Defendants actually filed with the DOT.

In Section III, Subsection B, the majority discusses the second type of rate at issue in this appeal: fuel surcharges. In 1999, when the DOT implemented the category A, B, and C rate-filing system, the DOT explicitly stated that “all surcharges are to be filed.” At the same time, however, the DOT did not allow fuel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  2. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API