Legal Opinion
People v. Holland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 27, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), rendered October 21, 2003, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court (Spires, J.), imposed October 31, 2005.
Ordered that the judgment and resentence are affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. DaddonaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BianchiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. ForinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. RobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RobbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012