Legal Opinion

Beylund v. Gomez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 1986No. 86-2122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant served letters on appellee’s counsel in response to the complaint, thereby triggering the notice provision of Florida Rule Civil Procedure 1.500(b); appellee, however, failed to provide appellant with the required notice. J.A.R. Inc. v. Universal American Realty Corp., 485 So.2d 467 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 462 So.2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Terino Bros., Inc. v. Airey, 364 So.2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Consequently, we reverse the Order Denying Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Jar, Inc. v. Universal American RealtyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Terino Bros., Inc. v. AireyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crocker Investments, Inc. v. Statesman Life Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Appliance & Refrigeration Distributors, Inc. v. Fedders Usa, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Crocker Inv. v. STATESMAN L. INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API