Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Kable

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1939No. 25402. Cause transferredPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The defendants, George J. Kable and Mary Edith Kable Caldwell, owned lot 62 and a part of lot 50 all in Assessors’ subdivision of the city of Springfield. In 1937, George J. Kable began to use a part of said lots for the parking of automobiles, for hire. The city of Springfield, its superintendent of buildings and sixteen property owners instituted a suit to enjoin such use, as being a violation of the zoning ordinance of the city. Because defendants’ property was used for various purposes, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, containing three counts, dividing the property into tracts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Pollack v. County of DupageIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Rago v. LipskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Akouris v. Village of Oak LawnIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. SchmidtIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API