Legal Opinion

Williams v. Concord Congregational Church

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1899No. Appeal, No. 167PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 167, Jan. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Erie Co., Nov. T., 1898, No. 1, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Morrison, J., of the 48th. judicial district, specially presiding. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was the decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

The plaintiffs filed the bill in this case, averring: 1. That in 1853, one Robert McCray donated to them land in Concord township whereon to build a Wesleyan Methodist church, which *123church was built and dedicated by their denomination, and since has been in its sole occupancy and control. 2. That on or about April 16,1898, the defendants took forcible possession of said church, and since that date have repeatedly done so, and loudly proclaim their purpose to continue so to do. 3. That none of defendants are members of the Wesleyan Methodist church, or have part in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drake v. LacoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. WeitzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Mirkil v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Searight v. Carlisle Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Lewis v. ScheppersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rivers v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Chemical Foundation, Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928
  3. Miller v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Farbwerke vormals Meister Lucius & Bruning v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  5. Rankin v. RankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API