Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Piper

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 21, 1965No. 5634PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants bring timely interlocutory appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss. The appellants contend, that the court lacks jurisdiction over the parties and over the cause.

The briefs and appendix reveal that on 10 September 1964 plaintiffs’ amended complaint was dismissed with twenty days leave to amend. On 29 September 1964, plaintiffs mailed their second amended complaint to the Clerk of Circuit Court and to the defendants. Since the amended complaint was not actually filed until the twenty first day on 1 October 1964; the defendants moved to dismiss the action for lack of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington SEC. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Stevens v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Hancock v. PiperSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Yarima Moreno v. People's Trust Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API