Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2007No. 06-30573PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:

Three appellants seek to represent a class of uninsured patients who received treatment from Appellee Ochsner Clinic Foundation (“Ochsner”) during a period of at least ten years. The district court denied class certification. Finding no reversible error of fact or law in the court’s careful and thorough consideration of this case, we affirm. See Maldonado v. Ochs-ner, 237 F.R.D. 145 (E.D.La.2006). Our opinion highlights the essential grounds for affirmance.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellants received medical treatment from Ochsner, a non-profit corporation receiving tax…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. AT&T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Bolin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re: MonumentalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Johnson v. Nextel Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. Shook v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. M.D. Ex Rel. Stukenberg v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API